Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through links on Auralockr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and servers) on. Learn more
CHI ARC Classic vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25: 103 Highlights & 51 Differences — So, Which Hair Curler Actually Works Better
Get a detailed comparison of CHI ARC Classic and Beachwaver Pro 1.25 curling irons. Discover their strengths and which one fits your needs. Trying to decide between CHI ARC Classic and Beachwaver Pro 1.25? This hair curlers comparison covers features, design, and key tourmaline technology, damage protection mode, glove & heat mat beauty lovers care about.
CHI ARC Classic vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25: A Detailed Curling Wand Face-Off
When it comes to curling wands designed for effortless and beautiful curls, the CHI ARC Classic Tourmaline Ceramic Auto Rotating Curler and the Beachwaver Pro 1.25 Curling Iron both deliver automatic curling functionality with a fixed 1.25-inch curl diameter. Both tools feature premium ceramic barrels coated with tourmaline to enhance smooth gliding and minimize frizz, alongside ceramic heating elements that quickly reach styling temperatures in about 30 seconds. They each have a 9ft 360° swivel cord ideal for maneuverability and offer dual voltage compatibility for travel convenience.
But beyond these similarities lie several pivotal distinctions. The CHI ARC Classic emphasizes customization with adjustable curl angle, timing, and tightness settings, plus advanced safety measures like a longer 60-minute auto shutoff and a thermal fuse. In contrast, the Beachwaver Pro 1.25 boasts modern tech perks such as a digital temperature display with a broader heat range (310°F to 450°F), infrared heat to enhance hair health, static reduction, and a clamp mechanism for easier hair control. These differences make each uniquely appealing depending on your styling priorities.
Customize Your Curling Experience With CHI ARC Classic
Safety is also prioritized; the device comes with an extended 60-minute auto shutoff and a built-in thermal fuse for extra protection from overheating. It includes useful accessories like a heat-resistant heat mat and a protective glove to avoid burns during styling. Additionally, it features high-end certifications such as CE certification and RoHS compliance, reflecting its adherence to stringent European safety and environmental standards.
Overall, the smooth operation, detailed user controls, and quality build provide a professional styling experience suitable for both home and salon use. The curler's ergonomic handle with a patterned grip ensures a comfortable hold during longer styling sessions. At the same time, the absence of a digital display keeps the interface simple and focused on performance.
Why the Beachwaver Pro 1.25 Appeals to Modern Hair Stylists
For those who want a blend of technological convenience and haircare enhancement, the Beachwaver Pro 1.25 shines with its digital temperature display, allowing you to precisely dial in heat from as low as 310°F up to 450°F. This wider temperature range offers styling versatility on different hair types, from fine to coarse.
The inclusion of infrared heat technology and features like static reduction and hair shine enhancement make it a standout device focused on maintaining hair integrity while styling. This curler's clamp mechanism is especially helpful for controlling hair strands, reducing slippage during curling.
Travelers and on-the-go stylists will appreciate the ergonomic handle with a smooth grip texture and a handy hanging loop for convenient storage. Although it weighs more than the CHI ARC Classic and offers slightly fewer customization settings, it compensates with its built-in safety stand and a 30-minute auto shut-off.
Despite a shorter warranty period and lacking the CE certification, the Beachwaver balances solid quality with additional certifications, including ETL and FCC certification, attesting to its electrical safety and emissions standards.
Quick Take
The CHI ARC Classic wins for those seeking extensive customizable curling options, robust safety features, and professional-quality certifications for durability and peace of mind. Meanwhile, the Beachwaver Pro 1.25 is a strong contender for stylists who want advanced digital controls, additional hair care benefits like infrared heat, and convenient travel-friendly features.
Bottom Line: Which Curling Wand Deserves Your Stylist Kit?
Choosing between these curling tools boils down to your priorities. If you value precise control over curl style with a lightweight, safe, and durable design backed by top-tier safety certifications, the CHI ARC Classic is the superior choice. However, if you prefer having heat customization via a digital display, added hair conditioning technologies, and prefer the ease of a clamp for curling, the Beachwaver Pro 1.25 delivers great value and versatility, especially at a potentially lower price point.
Verdict
Winner: CHI ARC Classic - Offers unmatched curling customization, longer warranty, advanced safety features, and professional quality certifications.
Runner-up: Beachwaver Pro 1.25 - Provides digital temperature control, hair-enhancing heat technology, and clamp functionality, ideal for those prioritizing hair care and convenience.
Prices start at $224.95 at LovelySkin.com for the CHI ARC Classic and range between $140 and $229 at various retailers for the Beachwaver Pro 1.25.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Can’t decide between CHI ARC Classic and Beachwaver Pro 1.25? This in-depth hair curlers breakdown highlights what makes each product unique — from standout features and hidden quirks to pricing, performance, and what actual users are saying.
Country of Origin for both products is China, meaning manufacturing location is the same.
Manufacturing country or origin label.
In the battle of Country of Origin, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Country of Origin on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Hair Type Compatibility: CHI ARC Classic supports Fine, Curly, Straight, and Wavy hair; Beachwaver Pro 1.25 expands compatibility including Thick, Frizzy, and Coarse along with CHI's types.
Indicates which hair types the curler works best with.
In the battle of Hair Type Compatibility, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Hair Type Compatibility on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What type of hair curler is this?
40 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Curling Wand
34 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Curling Iron
vs Product Type
The Product Type for CHI ARC Classic is Curling Wand, whereas for Beachwaver Pro 1.25 it is Curling Iron. Both serve the curling function but are distinct types, appealing to different styling preferences.
Defines the general type of hair curler.
In the battle of Product Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Product Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Series Name
What is the series name?
69 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes ARC Classic
60 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Pro Series
CHI ARC Classic
The ARC Classic series by CHI is designed to provide a high-performance, easy-to-use curling tool with rotating capabilities.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
The Pro line is positioned for stylists and heavy users, with higher max heat, an extended barrel, and a longer cord compared with the more budget-friendly B-Series.
Denotes the product series or line under which the model is categorized.
In the battle of Series Name, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 9 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Series Name on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use?
55 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Home, Professional
57 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Home, Professional, Travel
CHI ARC Classic
This curler is perfect for both at-home styling and professional salon use, offering salon-quality results in a personal setting.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Safe for at-home users but powerful enough for salon work; dual voltage and auto-shutoff make it a good fit for frequent travelers as well.
Specifies the target usage scenario for the curler.
In the battle of Intended Use, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Intended Use on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Curl Diameter Range
What is the curl diameter range?
30 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes 1.25 Inch
0 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes 1.25 inch
CHI ARC Classic
Equivalent to 3.18 cm, the 1.25-inch barrel is versatile, suitable for creating both loose waves and more defined curls.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
1.25 inch is about 3.18 cm in diameter, so think “big rollers” rather than tight ringlets, great for modern, undone waves.
Specifies the range of barrel diameters used to create different curl sizes.
In the battle of Curl Diameter Range, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 30 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curl Diameter Range on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
65 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes ARC Classic Tourmaline Ceramic Auto Rotating Curler
80 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 Curling Iron
CHI ARC Classic
Known for its automatic rotating barrel and tourmaline ceramic coating, this curler is excellent for both professional and home use.
Unique identifier or name assigned by the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 15 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Model Name on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What year was it released?
18 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes 2015
62 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes 2020
vs Release Year
Release Year shows CHI ARC Classic was released in 2015, Beachwaver Pro 1.25 in 2020, indicating the Beachwaver model is newer by 5 years.
Indicates the year the hair curler model was first released.
In the battle of Release Year, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 44 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Release Year on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Curl Style Type: CHI ARC Classic creates Loose Waves, Tight Curls, Beach Waves, while Beachwaver Pro 1.25 offers Loose Waves, Beach Waves, and Soft Curls, focusing more on softer styles.
Describes the style of curls achievable with this curler.
In the battle of Curl Style Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curl Style Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
This model does not fold, but its compact dimensions and swivel cord make it convenient for storage.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
The handle doesn’t fold, so it will take up the full ~46 cm length of the retail box in luggage. Using a heat-resistant sleeve can make packing easier.
Shows whether the device can be folded for travel or storage.
In the battle of Foldable Design, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Foldable Design on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
The lightweight design of the CHI ARC Classic is super important for me, especially during longer styling sessions. My arms get tired quickly, so 1.4 pounds sounds much better.
See more
Depth
What is the depth?
2 inch 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Depth
Depth: CHI ARC Classic is 2 inches deep; Beachwaver Pro 1.25 has no depth value available, so cannot compare.
The product’s side-to-side depth measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Depth on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height?
16.53 inch 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Height
Height: CHI ARC Classic height is 16.53 inches; Beachwaver Pro 1.25 height data is unavailable for comparison.
The vertical height when placed on a flat surface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Height on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Cord Length
What is the cord length?
9 ft 0Votes
9 ft 0Votes
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
A 9 ft cord is about 2.74 m long, giving plenty of reach across a bathroom or salon station without needing an extension cord.
Total electrical cord length from base to plug.
In the battle of Cord Length, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering equal 9.00 ft measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cord Length on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Handle Length
What is the handle length?
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The measured length of the handle portion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Handle Length on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Barrel Length
What is the barrel length?
1.25 inch 0Votes
6.5 inch 0Votes
vs Barrel Length
Barrel Length: CHI ARC Classic's barrel is 1.25 inches, whereas Beachwaver Pro 1.25 has a 6.5 inch barrel length, indicating a much larger barrel on the Beachwaver model.
The heating barrel’s usable length for curling.
In the battle of Barrel Length, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 5.3 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Barrel Length on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
I really prefer the digital temperature display on the Beachwaver Pro 1.25. It makes it super easy to know exactly what heat setting I'm using for my hair type, rather than guessing.
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
64 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes PTC
vs Heating Technology Type
Heating Technology Type: CHI ARC Classic has no data, whereas Beachwaver Pro 1.25 uses PTC technology, which is faster and more consistent heating.
Identifies the technology used for heat generation and regulation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heating Technology Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time for temperature to stabilize after use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Recovery Time on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Deviation in maintained temperature during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Temperature Stability on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Cool Tip: Both have cool tips, improving safety during use.
Whether the barrel tip remains cool during use.
In the battle of Cool Tip, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cool Tip on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Heating Element Material
What is the heating element made of?
60 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Ceramic
64 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Ceramic
vs Heating Element Material
Heating Element Material is Ceramic for both, ensuring quick and even heat distribution.
Material used in the core heating element.
In the battle of Heating Element Material, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heating Element Material on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Even Heat Distribution
Does it heat evenly?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Ensures consistent curling results with its evenly distributed heat, minimizing the risk of damage.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
The “custom internal heater” is designed to keep the barrel consistently hot so curls look even from root to ends, reducing the need to redo sections.
Measures if the curler distributes heat evenly across the barrel.
In the battle of Even Heat Distribution, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Even Heat Distribution on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Temperature Adjustment
Does it have automatic temperature adjustment?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Does not adjust the temperature automatically, giving you control over styling heat based on your preferences.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
There’s no smart sensor that changes heat automatically.
Automatically adjusts temperature to maintain uniform performance.
In the battle of Auto Temperature Adjustment, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Temperature Adjustment on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Voltage
Does it support dual voltage?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Dual voltage (110-240V) makes it suitable for use worldwide, ideal for travel.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Works on 100–240V power, so that it can be used in most countries with just a plug adapter, ideal for travel or destination weddings.
Whether the curler can operate on multiple voltage systems.
In the battle of Dual Voltage, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dual Voltage on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Max Temperature
What is the maximum temperature range?
410 °F 0Votes
450 °F 1Votes
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
450°F is about 232°C, giving enough power for very coarse or resistant hair, stylists often use this range for quick, long-lasting waves.
The highest temperature the curler can reach for thick or coarse hair styling.
In the battle of Max Temperature, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 40.0 °F measurement.
Based on community votes for Max Temperature, CHI ARC Classic ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉, which got 1 votes.
For my thicker hair, a higher max temperature is often needed to really set the curls well. The Beachwaver Pro 1.25's 450°F max temperature would work better for me.
See more
Min Temperature
What is the minimum temperature range?
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
310 °F 0Votes
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
310°F is roughly 154°C; this is a good starting point for fine or damaged hair that doesn’t need intense heat.
The lowest temperature the curler can be set to, suitable for fine or delicate hair.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Min Temperature on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Control Type
What type of temperature control does it use?
20 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Button
24 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Button
vs Temperature Control Type
Temperature Control Type is Button for both, indicating manual temp adjustment.
How the user adjusts temperature settings.
In the battle of Temperature Control Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Temperature Control Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Preset Temperature Settings
How many preset temperature levels does it have?
13 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes 1
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Preset Temperature Settings
Preset Temperature Settings: CHI ARC Classic has 1 preset setting, Beachwaver Pro 1.25 has none, showing different control approaches.
Number of predefined heat levels.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Preset Temperature Settings on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Efficiency
What is the thermal efficiency?
80 % 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Efficiency ratio of heat conversion from electrical energy.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Efficiency on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Honestly, the clamp mechanism on the Beachwaver Pro 1.25 just makes curling so much easier to handle. It helps hold my hair in place and prevents strands from slipping out while styling.
The curl release button allows for easy, smooth removal of styled curls from the barrel.
Whether there is a button to release curls automatically.
In the battle of Curl Release Button, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curl Release Button on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
You can control how long the hair is curled, allowing for different curl tightness and finishes.
Allows setting a timer for curling duration per section.
In the battle of Curling Time Control, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 38 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curling Time Control on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Curl Tightness Adjustment: CHI ARC Classic allows it, Beachwaver Pro 1.25 does not, offering more tightness control with CHI.
Indicates if the tightness or size of curls can be varied.
In the battle of Curl Tightness Adjustment, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 38 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curl Tightness Adjustment on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Fixed Curl Diameter is the same at 1.25 inches for both, standardized curl size.
The consistent diameter of the curling barrel that determines curl size.
In the battle of Fixed Curl Diameter, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering equal 1.25 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fixed Curl Diameter on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Average time required per curl rotation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curling Speed on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Curling Type
What is the curling type?
70 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Automatic
74 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Automatic
vs Curling Type
Curling Type for both is Automatic, simplifying curl creation.
Defines how the curler forms curls (manual wrapping or automated chamber).
In the battle of Curling Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curling Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Curl Memory Function
Does it have a curl memory function?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Curl Memory Function
Curl Memory Function is absent in both, so no memory of curl preference.
Saves last-used curling settings for repeat use.
In the battle of Curl Memory Function, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curl Memory Function on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Curling Angle Adjustability
Can the curling angle be adjusted?
Yes 1Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Curling Angle Adjustability
Curling Angle Adjustability: CHI ARC Classic supports it; Beachwaver Pro 1.25 does not, offering more styling flexibility in the CHI product.
Whether the curling barrel angle can be adjusted.
In the battle of Curling Angle Adjustability, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 38 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Curling Angle Adjustability, CHI ARC Classic ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉, which got 0 votes.
Having curling angle adjustability with the CHI ARC Classic is amazing for getting different curl styles. I like to switch between loose waves and tighter curls, and this feature really helps with that versatility.
See more
Rotation Direction
What rotation directions are available?
8 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Left, Right
14 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Left, Right
CHI ARC Classic
The rotating barrel can change direction, allowing you to create different curl patterns for various looks.
Specifies barrel rotation or auto-curl direction options.
In the battle of Rotation Direction, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Rotation Direction on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Curl Function
Does it have an auto curl function?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Auto Curl Function
Auto Curl Function: Both feature this function for easier curling.
Shows whether the device automatically draws in and curls hair.
In the battle of Auto Curl Function, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Curl Function on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Curl Chamber Type
What is the curl chamber type?
30 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Open
34 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Open
vs Curl Chamber Type
Curl Chamber Type is Open for both products, impacting curl formation style.
Defines the design of the curl chamber (if automatic type).
In the battle of Curl Chamber Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Curl Chamber Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Lights are present on both, providing operational feedback.
Presence of light indicators showing power, heat, or mode.
In the battle of Indicator Lights, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Indicator Lights on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
This model does not feature sound alerts, keeping the operation quiet.
Indicates if the curler emits sound cues for operation or timing.
In the battle of Sound Alerts, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sound Alerts on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Button Type
What type of buttons does it use?
20 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Physical
24 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Physical
vs Button Type
Button Type is Physical for both, ensuring tactile feedback.
Specifies the type of button mechanism used for control.
In the battle of Button Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Button Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Control Placement
Where are the controls located?
30 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Handle
34 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Handle
vs Control Placement
Control Placement is on the Handle for both, consistent ergonomic design.
Indicates where the main control interface is positioned.
In the battle of Control Placement, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Control Placement on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Switch Type
What kind of power switch does it have?
30 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Button
34 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Button
vs Power Switch Type
Power Switch Type is Button on both, standard control interface.
Describes how the device is turned on/off.
In the battle of Power Switch Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Switch Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
App Connectivity
Does it connect to an app?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs App Connectivity
App Connectivity is unavailable on both, limiting smart control options.
Whether the device can be paired with a mobile app for customization.
In the battle of App Connectivity, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the App Connectivity on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Connectivity
Is Bluetooth supported?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Lacks Bluetooth features, making this curler straightforward and easy to use without connectivity requirements.
Indicates if the curler uses Bluetooth for connectivity.
In the battle of Bluetooth Connectivity, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Bluetooth Connectivity on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Control Lock
Does it have a control lock?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Control Lock
Control Lock is absent in both, meaning controls are always accessible.
Prevents accidental button presses during use.
In the battle of Control Lock, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Control Lock on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Type is Type A for both products, suitable for standard US plugs.
Identifies the plug shape and pin type.
In the battle of Plug Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Plug Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Indicator
Does it have a power indicator?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Power Indicator
Power Indicator is present on both, showing power status.
Light indicator for power status.
In the battle of Power Indicator, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Indicator on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Plug Detachability
Is the plug detachable?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
The plug is not detachable for storage or transport.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
The plug is permanently attached, so there’s no risk of misplacing a detachable cord.
Whether the plug can be detached from the cord.
In the battle of Power Plug Detachability, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Plug Detachability on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Compatibility
What voltage does it support?
80 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes 110-240V
89 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes 100-240V
CHI ARC Classic
Suitable for use in most regions worldwide, working with standard household outlets.
Lists the voltage range supported by the device.
In the battle of Voltage Compatibility, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 9 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voltage Compatibility on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Voltage Detection
Does it have auto voltage detection?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Does not feature automatic voltage detection, but it supports dual voltage.
Device can automatically detect and adjust to different voltages.
In the battle of Auto Voltage Detection, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Voltage Detection on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Cord Swivel Range
What is the power cord swivel range?
40 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes 360°
44 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes 360°
CHI ARC Classic
Full 360° swivel range, ensuring tangle-free movement during use.
The degree of swivel rotation on the power cord.
In the battle of Power Cord Swivel Range, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Cord Swivel Range on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates the power draw of the curler.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Consumption on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
What is the standby power consumption?
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Power used when the device is plugged in but not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Standby Power Consumption on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Insulation Rating is Class II for both, ensuring double insulation.
Indicates level of electrical insulation.
In the battle of Insulation Rating, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Insulation Rating on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
The CHI ARC Classic has a longer auto shutoff timer, which is a big plus for safety-conscious people like me. I sometimes forget to turn off my tools, so 60 minutes gives me more peace of mind.
Thermal Fuse: CHI ARC Classic has it; Beachwaver Pro 1.25 does not, giving CHI an extra safety feature.
Internal fuse that breaks circuit during heat overload.
In the battle of Thermal Fuse, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 38 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Fuse on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Overheat Protection
Overheat Protection is included in both products, enhancing user safety.
Automatically cuts power if temperature exceeds safe limit.
In the battle of Overheat Protection, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overheat Protection on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Child Lock
Does it have a child lock feature?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Child Lock
Child Lock is absent on both products, so no child safety lock.
Prevents accidental activation by children.
In the battle of Child Lock, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Child Lock on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Scald Guard
Does it have an anti-scald guard?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
An anti-scald guard offers protection from burns during use.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
While not called out by name, the combo of cool tip + stand effectively acts as an anti-scald system when used correctly.
Protective guard prevents direct contact with hot barrel.
In the battle of Anti-Scald Guard, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Anti-Scald Guard on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification
What safety certifications does it have?
63 CHI ARC Classic 1Votes UL, CE
64 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes UL, ETL
vs Safety Certification
Safety Certification: CHI ARC Classic holds UL and CE; Beachwaver Pro 1.25 has UL and ETL, reflecting varied certifications.
Certifications verifying electrical and thermal safety.
In the battle of Safety Certification, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Safety Certification, CHI ARC Classic ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉, which got 0 votes.
I value strong safety certifications, and the CHI ARC Classic having both UL and CE certifications is really reassuring. It feels like a more reliable and well-regulated product.
See more
Safety Stand
Does it have a safety stand?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Safety Stand
Safety Stand: CHI ARC Classic has none; Beachwaver Pro 1.25 includes a safety stand for stable placement.
Built-in or attachable stand to safely rest the hot curler.
In the battle of Safety Stand, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Safety Stand on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Cool-Tip Protection
Does it feature cool-tip protection?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Does not have a cool tip for added protection, requiring cautious handling during use.
Insulated tip area to prevent finger burns.
In the battle of Cool-Tip Protection, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cool-Tip Protection on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat-Resistant Housing
Is the housing heat-resistant?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
vs Heat-Resistant Housing
Heat-Resistant Housing is present on both, reducing risk of burns.
Exterior remains safe to touch during operation.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Housing, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat-Resistant Housing on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Compliance Standards
What safety compliance standards are met?
73 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes IEC, ANSI
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
CHI ARC Classic
Complies with international safety standards, ensuring reliable and secure use.
Lists international standards met by the product.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Safety Compliance Standards on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Easy to clean with a damp cloth, requiring minimal maintenance.
Reflects how much effort is needed to clean the barrel and handle.
In the battle of Cleaning Difficulty, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cleaning Difficulty on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Ergonomic Handle
Does it have an ergonomic handle?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
The ergonomic handle ensures comfort during use, making it easier to hold for long periods.
Indicates if the handle is contoured for natural grip and comfort.
In the battle of Ergonomic Handle, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ergonomic Handle on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Lightweight Design
Is it lightweight?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Weighing just 1.4 lbs, this lightweight curler reduces wrist strain for comfortable use.
Refers to a reduced overall weight for ease of maneuvering.
In the battle of Lightweight Design, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 38 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Lightweight Design on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel-Friendly Design
Is it designed for travel?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Compact and lightweight, this curler is ideal for travel and easy to pack in any suitcase.
Indicates compact or dual-voltage design for travel convenience.
In the battle of Travel-Friendly Design, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Travel-Friendly Design on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Pouch
Is a storage pouch included?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
No storage pouch is included, but the compact size allows for easy storage in any drawer or bag.
Specifies if a protective or travel pouch is included.
In the battle of Storage Pouch, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Storage Pouch on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
What is the noise level in dB?
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures operational sound for quietness during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Noise Level on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Vibration Level
What is the vibration level?
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates vibration frequency or intensity during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Vibration Level on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
The tourmaline coating helps reduce static and frizz, giving your hair a smooth, shiny finish.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Tourmaline infusion is especially helpful in humid climates, where frizz control and shine are top priorities.
Incorporates tourmaline to emit negative ions for silkier hair.
In the battle of Tourmaline Technology, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Tourmaline Technology on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Does not have a specific damage protection mode but uses ceramic technology to reduce heat damage.
Smart mode that adjusts heat to prevent overexposure.
In the battle of Damage Protection Mode, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Damage Protection Mode on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Ceramic Technology
Does it use ceramic technology?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Ceramic technology ensures even heat distribution for consistent results.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Ceramic helps distribute heat evenly, which reduces hot spots and can be gentler on color-treated hair.
Uses ceramic coating or barrels for even heat distribution.
In the battle of Ceramic Technology, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ceramic Technology on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Steam Function
Does it include a steam function?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Lacks a steam function, but still delivers beautiful curls and waves with its rotating mechanism.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
There’s no steam or water reservoir; always use it on dry hair (or with a heat-protectant spray) for best results.
Emits steam to hydrate hair during curling for smooth texture.
In the battle of Steam Function, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Steam Function on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Lock System
Does it feature a moisture lock system?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
No moisture lock system, but the ceramic and tourmaline coating helps maintain hair's natural moisture.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Moisture retention comes from using lower heat and good products rather than any built-in steam or conditioning cartridge.
Helps retain natural hair moisture during heat styling.
In the battle of Moisture Lock System, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Moisture Lock System on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Frizz Feature
Does it have an anti-frizz feature?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
The anti-frizz feature helps to keep hair looking smooth and polished all day.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Between the ceramic/tourmaline barrel and controlled heat, it’s designed to leave hair smoother and less puffy after styling.
Minimizes frizz caused by heat and humidity.
In the battle of Anti-Frizz Feature, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Anti-Frizz Feature on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Static Reduction
Does it provide static reduction?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Does not have a static reduction feature, but the tourmaline coating helps minimize frizz.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Helps tame static, especially in dry winter air when hair tends to fly away after brushing.
Reduces static buildup caused by heat and friction.
In the battle of Static Reduction, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Static Reduction on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Infrared Heat
Does it use infrared heat?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 1Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
This model does not include infrared heat, but the ceramic and tourmaline materials provide effective heat styling.
Uses infrared heating to penetrate hair gently from within.
In the battle of Infrared Heat, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Based on community votes for Infrared Heat, CHI ARC Classic ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉, which got 1 votes.
Infrared heat is a game-changer for hair health, so the Beachwaver Pro 1.25 definitely wins for me. My hair tends to get dry easily, so anything that minimizes damage is a huge plus.
See more
Hair Shine Enhancement
Does it enhance hair shine?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
While it doesn't actively enhance shine, the tourmaline coating adds a glossy finish to your curls.
Improves hair gloss and smoothness for a polished finish.
In the battle of Hair Shine Enhancement, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Hair Shine Enhancement on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Ionic Technology
Does it feature ionic technology?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Emits negative ions to reduce static and enhance smoothness.
In the battle of Ionic Technology, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ionic Technology on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Including a heat mat with the CHI ARC Classic is such a thoughtful detail. It protects my surfaces from heat damage and makes the whole styling process much more convenient and safer.
Replacement parts are available, but may be harder to find over time.
Indicates if replacement parts are available for purchase.
In the battle of Replacement Parts Availability, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Replacement Parts Availability on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Barrel
Does it have a detachable barrel?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Barrel is fixed and cannot be detached for easy storage or cleaning.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
The barrel is fixed, which keeps it sturdy, no wobble or looseness that sometimes happens with interchangeable systems.
Indicates if the barrel can be removed for cleaning or swapping.
In the battle of Detachable Barrel, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Detachable Barrel on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Case
Is a travel case included?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Does not come with a travel case, but its compact design makes it travel-friendly.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
The retail box is long and not padded; a dedicated travel case helps protect the barrel coating in luggage.
Case for safe storage and portability.
In the battle of Travel Case, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Travel Case on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Cleaning Tool
Is there a cleaning tool included?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
No cleaning tool is provided, but regular cleaning with a damp cloth is sufficient.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Cleaning is basic wipe-down maintenance—no special tool is required.
Comes with tools for cleaning or maintaining barrel surface.
In the battle of Cleaning Tool, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cleaning Tool on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Interchangeable Barrel Sizes
Does it support interchangeable barrel sizes?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
This model uses a single, fixed barrel size for styling.
Supports different barrel diameters for varied curl styles.
In the battle of Interchangeable Barrel Sizes, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Interchangeable Barrel Sizes on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Brush Attachment
Is a brush attachment included?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
No brush attachment included; designed for use as a standalone curling wand.
Attachment with bristles for smoothing or volumizing.
In the battle of Brush Attachment, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Brush Attachment on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Comb Attachment
Is there a comb attachment?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Lacks a comb attachment, but the open chamber design makes it easy to glide hair through.
Clip-on comb for detangling or guiding hair during curling.
In the battle of Comb Attachment, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Comb Attachment on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Clip
Does it include a storage clip?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Does not include a storage clip, but its small size makes it easy to store anywhere.
Built-in or separate clip to secure cord or accessories.
In the battle of Storage Clip, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Storage Clip on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Reinforced for enhanced durability, ensuring the cord lasts longer through frequent use.
Describes cord strength and strain relief quality.
In the battle of Cord Durability Rating, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 56 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cord Durability Rating on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Period
What is the warranty period?
24 Months 1Votes
12 Months 0Votes
CHI ARC Classic
A 24-month warranty covers manufacturing defects, offering peace of mind for users.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Comes with about a 1-year manufacturer's warranty, which is standard for pro hot tools in this price range.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty Period, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 12.0 Months measurement.
Based on community votes for Warranty Period, CHI ARC Classic ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉, which got 0 votes.
A longer warranty period really shows a brand's confidence in its product, and 24 months for the CHI ARC Classic is great. It gives me peace of mind about my investment.
See more
Replacement Part Support Duration
How long are replacement parts supported?
1 years 0Votes
1 years 0Votes
CHI ARC Classic
Parts support lasts for 1 year, ensuring availability of essential parts.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
There’s no published parts program; consider this a rough expectation rather than a guaranteed supply period.
Duration manufacturer provides spare parts.
In the battle of Replacement Part Support Duration, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering equal 1.00 years measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Replacement Part Support Duration on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Heating Element Lifespan
What is the heating element lifespan?
5 years 0Votes
3 years 0Votes
CHI ARC Classic
The ceramic heating element is durable and should last up to 5 years.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Heaters often outlast cosmetic wear; if heat output drops noticeably before then, it’s usually covered within the warranty window.
Expected operational lifespan of heating element.
In the battle of Heating Element Lifespan, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 2.0 years measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heating Element Lifespan on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
What is the water resistance rating?
0 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes None
0 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes None
CHI ARC Classic
This curler is not water-resistant, so care should be taken to keep it dry.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Not water-resistant; always keep away from sinks, baths, and wet countertops and never use with wet hands.
Indicates ability to resist water exposure.
In the battle of Water Resistance, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Water Resistance on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Frequency
How often should it be maintained?
20 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Quarterly
34 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Monthly
CHI ARC Classic
For best results, clean and maintain this curler every three months.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
A quick monthly wipe of the barrel to remove styling residue will help it glide smoothly and protect the coating.
Recommended cleaning or servicing frequency.
In the battle of Maintenance Frequency, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 14 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Maintenance Frequency on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Cleaning Method
What is the cleaning method?
50 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Damp Cloth
34 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Dry Cloth
CHI ARC Classic
Easily cleaned with a damp cloth to maintain its performance and appearance.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
Use a soft, dry or slightly damp cloth on a completely cool, unplugged iron; avoid harsh chemicals or scrubbing pads that could scratch the barrel.
Recommended cleaning approach.
In the battle of Cleaning Method, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 16 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cleaning Method on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Service Availability
Where is service available?
50 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Regional
94 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Global
CHI ARC Classic
Service support is available regionally, providing easy access to assistance when needed.
Indicates where repair services are available.
In the battle of Service Availability, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 44 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Service Availability on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
This curler does not include recyclable components, which may limit its sustainability.
Indicates whether key components can be recycled at end of life.
In the battle of Recyclable Components, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recyclable Components on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Saving Mode
Does it have an energy saving mode?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Does not have an energy-saving mode, but the curler is efficient in its power consumption.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
No special low-power mode—the main energy saver is the 30-minute auto-shutoff.
Indicates if the device includes a power-saving operation mode.
In the battle of Energy Saving Mode, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Energy Saving Mode on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Eco-Friendly Materials
Is it made with eco-friendly materials?
No 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
This product does not include eco-friendly materials, so buyers should be mindful of the environmental impact.
Uses environmentally responsible or recycled materials in construction.
In the battle of Eco-Friendly Materials, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is same as Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Eco-Friendly Materials on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What type of packaging does it use?
30 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Box
34 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Box
CHI ARC Classic
The product is packaged in a box, offering secure protection during shipping and handling.
Describes how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Packaging Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Material
What packaging materials are used?
40 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Cardboard
44 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Cardboard
CHI ARC Classic
Cardboard packaging is used, which is easy to recycle and offers adequate protection.
Lists the primary materials used in packaging.
In the battle of Packaging Material, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Packaging Material on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency Class
What is its power efficiency class?
58 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes A
64 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes A
CHI ARC Classic
Efficient in energy use, rated as an A-class power-efficient appliance.
Classification based on energy efficiency.
In the battle of Power Efficiency Class, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Efficiency Class on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Recyclable Packaging
Is the packaging recyclable?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
The packaging is recyclable, which helps reduce the environmental impact.
Indicates if the packaging itself is recyclable.
In the battle of Recyclable Packaging, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recyclable Packaging on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
UL certified, meeting strict safety standards for use in North America.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
UL listing indicates the tool has been evaluated to meet specific North American electrical safety standards.
Verifies product meets UL’s U.S. safety standards.
In the battle of UL Certification, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the UL Certification on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Lacks ETL certification, but it meets other safety standards.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
ETL is an alternative NRTL mark to UL; some production runs may carry one, the other, or both depending on factory certification.
Indicates independent testing for North American safety compliance.
In the battle of ETL Certification, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the ETL Certification on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Does not have FCC certification, but its performance remains within safe operating standards.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
FCC isn’t generally a selling point here since the iron doesn’t use wireless radios; any marking would relate to basic electromagnetic compatibility.
Ensures electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance for electronic devices.
In the battle of FCC Certification, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the FCC Certification on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Manufactured under ISO 9001 standards, ensuring quality and consistency.
Indicates manufacturer’s compliance with ISO standards.
In the battle of ISO Certification, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 90 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the ISO Certification on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Complies with RoHS standards, ensuring that the product is free from hazardous materials.
Confirms restriction of hazardous substances in materials.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 38 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the RoHS Compliance on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
CE Certification
Is it CE certified?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
No 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Certified with CE standards, ensuring it meets health, safety, and environmental requirements.
Confirms compliance with European safety, health, and environmental requirements.
In the battle of CE Certification, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 38 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the CE Certification on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Manufacturer Quality Grade
What is the manufacturer quality grade?
65 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes A
69 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes A
CHI ARC Classic
The manufacturer is graded A for quality, indicating high-quality manufacturing processes.
Internal or third-party manufacturing quality rating.
In the battle of Manufacturer Quality Grade, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Manufacturer Quality Grade on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Standard Code
What safety standard code applies?
Who knows? 0Votes CHI ARC Classic (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Refers to specific safety design standard followed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Safety Standard Code on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
How easy is it to control heat and curl direction?
90 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Excellent
94 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Excellent
CHI ARC Classic
Controls are simple and intuitive, making the curler easy to operate.
Evaluates the responsiveness and intuitiveness of the controls.
In the battle of Ease of Control, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ease of Control on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Operation Smoothness
How smooth is the curling operation?
80 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Very Smooth
64 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Smooth
CHI ARC Classic
The curler operates smoothly, with minimal snagging or tugging on the hair.
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
The rotation is designed to feel fluid rather than jerky, so hair glides without catching when properly brushed out beforehand.
Describes the smoothness of operation while curling hair.
In the battle of Operation Smoothness, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 16 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Operation Smoothness on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Learning Curve
How easy is it to learn using the curler?
90 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Easy
94 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Easy
CHI ARC Classic
Easy to use, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced users.
Describes how quickly users can learn to operate the device effectively.
In the battle of Learning Curve, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Learning Curve on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Handling Comfort
How comfortable is the curler to handle?
90 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Excellent
94 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Excellent
CHI ARC Classic
The ergonomic design ensures comfort during use, even for extended styling sessions.
Reflects how comfortable the curler feels during use.
In the battle of Handling Comfort, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Handling Comfort on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Satisfaction Level
What is the satisfaction percentage?
90 % 0Votes
88 % 0Votes
CHI ARC Classic
High user satisfaction with 90% of customers reporting positive experiences.
Measures the percentage of users satisfied with the product’s performance.
In the battle of Satisfaction Level, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 2.0 % measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Satisfaction Level on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Comfort During Use
Is it comfortable to use for long sessions?
Yes 0Votes CHI ARC Classic
Yes 0Votes Beachwaver Pro 1.25
CHI ARC Classic
Provides a comfortable styling experience, reducing wrist strain thanks to its ergonomic design.
Indicates whether the curler remains comfortable to use for long periods.
In the battle of Comfort During Use, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Comfort During Use on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Distribution Consistency
How consistent is the heat distribution?
90 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Excellent
44 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Good
CHI ARC Classic
Delivers consistent heat for evenly styled curls, reducing the risk of hair damage.
Assesses how evenly heat is distributed across the barrel.
In the battle of Heat Distribution Consistency, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 46 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Distribution Consistency on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Comfort Temperature Perception
How does the temperature feel during styling?
90 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Comfortable
94 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Comfortable
CHI ARC Classic
The curler operates at a comfortable temperature, providing effective styling without excessive heat.
Measures how users perceive barrel or handle temperature during use.
In the battle of Comfort Temperature Perception, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Comfort Temperature Perception on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Overall Usability Score
What is the overall usability score?
75 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes 9
80 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes 9
CHI ARC Classic
Highly rated with an overall score of 9 out of 10, indicating user satisfaction with its performance and ease of use.
Quantifies the combined ease, comfort, and satisfaction aspects into one metric.
In the battle of Overall Usability Score, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overall Usability Score on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging & Shipping 5
Package Width
What is the package width?
5.5 inch 0Votes
4.13 inch 0Votes
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
4.13 in is about 10.5 cm wide, so the box is roughly the width of a hardcover book.
Indicates the width of the product packaging.
In the battle of Package Width, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 1.4 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Width on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
2.5 inch 0Votes
2.72 inch 0Votes
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
2.72 in is about 6.9 cm deep, so it doesn’t take much front-to-back space on a shelf.
Indicates the depth of the product packaging.
In the battle of Package Depth, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 0.2 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Depth on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
17 inch 0Votes
17.95 inch 0Votes
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
17.95 in is about 45.6 cm long, around the length of a standard keyboard or a small baguette, so it fits easily along a closet shelf.
Indicates the height of the product packaging.
In the battle of Package Height, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is better than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 0.9 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Height on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Weight
What is the package weight?
2.5 lbs 0Votes
1.79 lbs 0Votes
Beachwaver Pro 1.25
1.79 lb is roughly 0.81 kg, similar to carrying a large tablet or a thick textbook.
Specifies the total weight of the packaged unit.
In the battle of Package Weight, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering higher 0.7 lbs measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Weight on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Retail Packaging Type
What is the retail packaging type?
30 CHI ARC Classic 0Votes Box
34 Beachwaver Pro 1.25 0Votes Box
CHI ARC Classic
Comes in a box for secure storage and transport.
Describes how the product is presented for retail sale.
In the battle of Retail Packaging Type, CHI ARC Classic ◉ is worse than Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ , delivering lower 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Retail Packaging Type on CHI ARC Classic ◉ vs Beachwaver Pro 1.25 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this hair curler?
Extremely easy — Simple to use, with clear instructions and no hassle.
0Votes
0Votes
Easy — A bit of a learning curve, but overall simple to use.
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Somewhat confusing, but manageable after a few tries.
0Votes
0Votes
Hard — Challenging to use, with a steep learning curve.
0Votes
0Votes
Very hard — Difficult to use, unclear instructions, and not user-friendly.
0Votes
0Votes
Heating Time
How quickly does this hair curler heat up?
Very fast — Heats up in under 30 seconds.
0Votes
0Votes
Fast — Heats up in 30 to 60 seconds.
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Heats up in 1 to 2 minutes.
0Votes
0Votes
Slow — Heats up in 2 to 4 minutes.
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow — Takes over 4 minutes to heat up.
0Votes
0Votes
Hair Curling Quality
How would you rate the quality of the curls produced by this hair curler?
Perfect curls — Bouncy, smooth, and last all day.
0Votes
0Votes
Great curls — Bouncy and smooth, but may need a touch-up after a few hours.
0Votes
0Votes
Good curls — Curls are okay but tend to fall out or frizz after a few hours.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair curls — Curls are inconsistent, some may not hold well.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor curls — The curls don’t hold and often end up flat or frizzy.
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How would you rate the design and appearance of this hair curler?
Stylish and sleek — Looks great and feels premium.
0Votes
0Votes
Attractive — Looks nice, with good build quality.
0Votes
0Votes
Neutral — Average look, not too exciting but functional.
0Votes
0Votes
Unimpressive — Doesn’t look great or feels cheaply made.
0Votes
0Votes
Ugly — Design is unattractive and feels low-quality.
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Level
How would you rate the noise level of this hair curler while in use?
Very quiet — Almost silent during operation.
0Votes
0Votes
Quiet — Makes a soft noise, not disturbing.
0Votes
0Votes
Average — Slightly noisy, but tolerable.
0Votes
0Votes
Loud — Can be heard clearly, might be annoying to others.
0Votes
0Votes
Very loud — The noise is distracting and uncomfortable.
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How would you rate the pricing of this hair curler?
Great value for money — Offers excellent performance at a great price.
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price — Reasonably priced for the quality you get.
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal — A fair price for the features offered.
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey — A bit expensive for the features, but still acceptable.
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive — Overpriced for the performance and features.
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable do you find this hair curler?
Very durable — Stands up to frequent use and feels built to last.
0Votes
0Votes
Durable — Holds up well with regular use, no major issues.
0Votes
0Votes
Average durability — Works fine but may show signs of wear after some use.
0Votes
0Votes
Below average durability — Starts to wear down or malfunction after a few uses.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor durability — Breaks easily or shows serious damage quickly.
0Votes
0Votes
Comfort of Use
How comfortable is it to hold and use this hair curler for extended periods?
Very comfortable — Ergonomically designed and easy to handle for long sessions.
0Votes
0Votes
Comfortable — Feels fine to hold, with no major discomfort during use.
0Votes
0Votes
Average comfort — Okay for short use but may feel awkward after a while.
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortable — Starts to feel tiring or awkward after a short time.
0Votes
0Votes
Very uncomfortable — Difficult to hold and causes hand or wrist pain after use.
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Control Features
How effective are the heat control features on this hair curler?
Excellent heat control — Precise temperature settings for perfect results every time.
0Votes
0Votes
Good heat control — Temperature is adjustable, with minor fluctuation.
0Votes
0Votes
Average heat control — Some fluctuation in temperature, but usable.
0Votes
0Votes
Below average heat control — Temperature doesn’t always stay consistent.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor heat control — No reliable temperature settings, often too hot or too cold.
0Votes
0Votes
Safety Features
How would you rate the safety features of this hair curler?
Excellent safety features — Automatic shut-off and heat-resistant tips for complete peace of mind.
0Votes
0Votes
Good safety features — Includes automatic shut-off or other safety measures.
0Votes
0Votes
Average safety features — Basic safety measures, like a cool tip or automatic shut-off.
0Votes
0Votes
Below average safety features — Some safety features, but they don’t feel reliable.
0Votes
0Votes
Poor safety features — Lacks basic safety features like auto shut-off.
Supermod 
Moderator 
Recaptor 
0 Cartling 
